Ink Mallo

Unisex
Eau de Parfum
Year: 2024
Moderate
Sillage
Good
Longevity
Fall
Best Season
Evening
Best For

Fragrance Story

INK by Mallo is a fragrance for women and men. This is a new fragrance. INK was launched in 2024. INK was created by Antonio Lasheras and Rajesh Balkrishnan.

Composition Profile

woody 100%
amber 85%
aromatic 70%
fruity 60%
sweet 50%
warm spicy 40%
balsamic 35%
oud 30%
fresh spicy 25%

About the Perfumer

Antonio Lasheras

Antonio Lasheras

Antonio Lasheras is a Spanish perfumer known for his work with the Mallo brand. He has created a series of fragrances for the house, including Ara(gon), Arc, Bd, Cubalibre, Hoz, Ink, Jiz, and Ora. His scents often explore abstract themes and minimalist structures, with a focus on raw, textural accords.

Fragrance Notes

All Notes

Complete scent profile

Ink Ink
Raspberry Raspberry
Styrax Styrax
Sandalwood Sandalwood
Frankincense Frankincense
Indian Oud Indian Oud
Oakmoss Oakmoss
Labdanum Labdanum
Unique Character

Ink Mallo by Mallo offers a distinctive olfactory experience that stands out from other fragrances in its category.

Artisanal Creation

Crafted with the finest ingredients and a blend of traditional and modern perfumery techniques, this fragrance represents the pinnacle of the perfumer's art.

Signature Style

Ink Mallo embodies the distinctive style of Mallo while adding a unique chapter to their fragrance portfolio.

Character Profile

The Alchemist Archetype: Portrait of Ink Mallo

Essence

To wear Ink Mallo is to embrace a paradox-a fragrance that is both dark and sweet, structured yet elusive, like ink dissolving in milk. The person who chooses this scent is drawn to transformation, to the alchemy of blending opposing forces into something new. They are, at their core, an Alchemist-an archetype defined by curiosity, experimentation, and the relentless pursuit of turning the mundane into the extraordinary.

Style & Aesthetic

Their appearance reflects their inner duality-structured yet unpredictable. They favor sharp lines mixed with soft textures, monochrome with a single unexpected accent. Perhaps they wear a tailored coat with a subtly rumpled shirt beneath, or sleek leather gloves with a single, ornate ring. Their style is not loud but intentional, each choice a quiet statement.

They are drawn to art that unsettles just enough to provoke thought-films with ambiguous endings, music that blends dissonance with harmony, literature that lingers in the mind like an unsolved riddle.

Their days are a mix of discipline and spontaneity. They thrive on routine when it serves their craft but abandon it without hesitation when inspiration strikes. Their workspace is organized chaos-a notebook filled with half-formed ideas next to a meticulously arranged collection of inks, pens, or other tools of creation.

They are nocturnal by inclination, finding clarity in the quiet hours when the world sleeps. Coffee or tea is a ritual, not just a drink-each cup a small ceremony marking the transition between thought and action.

Philosophy & Values

They see life as a laboratory, a place where raw experience can be distilled into meaning. Their philosophy is not rigid but fluid, shaped by the belief that truth is found in the interplay of contradictions. They value intelligence, but not in the sterile sense of mere facts-they crave wisdom, the kind that emerges from testing ideas against the friction of reality.

Yet, this pursuit has its dangers. The Alchemist’s shadow is the Deceiver, the part of them that becomes so enamored with transformation that they lose sight of what is real. They may manipulate words, emotions, or even their own identity in the name of experimentation, leaving others unsure of who they truly are.

Relationships

They are magnetic but not always easy to know. People are drawn to their depth, their ability to see beyond surfaces, but they may struggle with vulnerability. Their relationships are often layered-intellectual sparring partners, lovers who double as muses, friends who become collaborators in some grand, undefined project.

Yet, their tendency to intellectualize emotion can leave others feeling like subjects in an experiment rather than equals. They may withdraw when confronted with raw feeling, retreating into analysis rather than presence.

Conclusion

Their greatest strength is their ability to see potential where others see only what is. They are visionaries, synthesizers, the ones who can take fragments and forge them into something new. But their flaw is impatience with the ordinary. They may dismiss stability as stagnation, mistake comfort for complacency, and in doing so, lose the grounding that keeps their brilliance from burning too brightly.