No. 30 The Fragrance Design Studio

Unisex
Eau de Parfum
Year: 2012

At a glance

Is No. 30 The Fragrance Design Studio worth trying?

No.

Best match
Casual wear in Spring
Performance feel
Moderate longevity with Moderate sillage
Signature profile
citrus, fresh spicy, aromatic with Pink Grapefruit, Pink Pepper, Birch

The first impression

No. 30 by The Fragrance Design Studio is a Aromatic fragrance for women and men. No. 30 was launched in 2012. The nose behind this fragrance is Cecile Hua.

What shapes the scent

citrus 100%
fresh spicy 85%
aromatic 70%
woody 60%
green 50%
leather 40%
smoky 35%
soft spicy 30%

The perfumer behind it

Cecile Hua

Cecile Hua

Cecile Hua has composed fragrances for 4711, Amouroud, Arielle Shoshana, and Atelier Cologne. Her work ranges from fresh citrus blends like 4711 Acqua Colonia Pink Pepper & Grapefruit to deeper floral and woody creations such as Dark Orchid. She is known for her ability to balance clarity with complexity across different styles.

Notes pyramid

All Notes

Complete scent profile

Pink Grapefruit Pink Grapefruit
Pink Pepper Pink Pepper
Birch Birch
Bergamot Bergamot
Vetiver Vetiver
Basil Basil
Green Apple Green Apple
Heliotrope Heliotrope

The mood it creates

The Alchemist Archetype: Portrait of No. 30 The Fragrance Design Studio

Essence

No. 30 The Fragrance Design Studio is not a scent for those who seek simplicity. It is layered, enigmatic, shifting between warmth and sharpness-much like the person who wears it. This is not a fragrance chosen by accident; it is a declaration of identity, a potion brewed by someone who understands transformation. The individual who favors this scent is, at their core, an Alchemist-an archetype defined by the pursuit of turning the ordinary into the extraordinary, the mundane into the sacred.

Shadow

But every archetype has its shadow. The Alchemist’s brilliance is also their flaw: their relentless pursuit of transformation can become a refusal to accept the present. They may grow frustrated with imperfection-in themselves, in others, in the world. Their idealism can curdle into elitism, a quiet disdain for those who do not share their vision.

They may also fall prey to the illusion that they can control every reaction, every outcome-like an alchemist who believes they can turn lead into gold through sheer will. When life resists their attempts at refinement, they may withdraw into bitterness or melancholy. Their love of depth can become a prison; they forget that sometimes, a thing is beautiful precisely because it is fleeting, unrefined.

Conclusion

Their life is an experiment, a series of trials in refining the self. They are drawn to complexity-philosophy, art, and science are not separate disciplines to them, but threads of the same tapestry. They read Jung not for academic rigor but for the thrill of recognizing themselves in the symbols of the collective unconscious. Their bookshelf is a curated museum of alchemical texts, modernist poetry, and treatises on perfumery. They believe that beauty is not accidental; it is the result of deliberate craftsmanship.

Their style reflects this philosophy. They favor textures that invite touch-soft cashmere, aged leather, silk that whispers against the skin. Their wardrobe is not dictated by trends but by the sensory experience of wearing each piece. They may wear a vintage coat with a modern cut, or a ring with an obscure symbol etched into its surface. Every choice is intentional, a small act of alchemy.